Student Participatory Initiatives. Comparison

This summer I took part in the Osthang Project together with other 60 participants and around 30 tutors. During the same dates there were other similar (building) experimentations I was interested in, but unfortunately, I couldn´t participate. But my curiosity of how they were working made me compare them in diverse aspects.
It seems that such building initiatives in public spaces are quite common and they aim the re-activation of the space, but do they really achieve such a goal? Aren´t they too short in time to achieve a real re-use of the space? What is the role of the students that arrive from abroad to the certain spot and context? Could they really feel the atmosphere of the place and react by building an object to the current needs of the local population? What is the role of the neighbours that will use the public space/object - visitors or participants? Is it possible to intervene with local small businesses and are these initiatives beneficial for them? and many other questions. Some of them were discussed during the Osthang Project in Darmstadt.
Also I could visit Villena for a day and talk to tutors and organizers of elCASC where I received a lot of precious information and good vibes from the participants and the neighbours.


The feedback of some participants, tutors and organizers is expected and that is why, this table is incomplete.



OSTHANG PROJECT
Summer School
elCASC 2014
EASA 2014_symбиоза
+ info
What is?
International Summer School for experimental building and Festival for Future Modes of Living Together
Festival for urban and sociocultural regeneration
Festival of workshops, lectures, social interaction and monumental experiences (34th European Architecture Students Assembly)
Where?
Osthang, Mathildenhöhe
Darmstadt, Germany
Historic Centre
Villena, Spain

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Who?
60 participants in 5 workshops
100 participants in 6 workshops
500 participants in 42 workshops
When?
7 – 27 July 2014
23 July – 2 August 2014
29 July – 8 August 2013
21 July – 2 August 2014
(annually, in different places in Europe)
Why?
(goals of the initiative)
Testing the city as a sphere of action as experimental collective designs become structural forms .
Building becomes an active process that reacts directly to the location at hand; the unforeseen represents not a nuisance, but rather: potential.
Exploring the questions: Living Together? What does community mean today? What spaces does the community need? How will we build for the community or how do we
build communally?
The Festival aims to revive the urban and social fabric, establishing a small test-field to apply the study of urban, social, cultural and technological problems and potentials of the town.
Considering the example of the historic center of Villena as an alternative way to study the heritage and its recovery in other historic centres.
Symбиоза aims to investigate architecture as part of a complex network, where every element is substantially affected by the behavior of all others.
Our purpose is to involve (besides Architecture students) non-architects in EASA 2014 – be it as tutors, participants or lecturers – to share their views, and to rethink architecture in symбиоза with professionals from divergent spheres of activity.
How?
(strategies, programme)
A very intense impact by international young building teams provokes a change in thinking of the neighbours and encourages them to take part in reviving the area, helped by the students of the adjacent Design School
Continuous summer interventions in the old town made by young people in the sphere of arts and architecture provokes interactions between neighbours and their environment and different social groups
A very intense action by European art and architectre students to showcase the values of different spots in town, by building objects or arranging performances to impact on neighbours so that they can be more active in town reactivation
Relationship with
neighbours
Upper-class residential area (general low activity)
visit to the construction site
one neighbour came and worked several days (there was not an open call for the neighbours to tae part in)
Hochschule Darmstadt, Faculty of Design
People at risk of poverty or social exclusion – participation in certain works, games and parties;
Self-initiated meal preparation for the participants (small payment)
Open call for the people of Villena

General passivity in neighbours; some projects collaborated with local collectives in order to have a continuity in the use or maintainance 
Relationship with
the city
Intense communication during the last months
Discount prices in bars and restaurants for the participants
Participants were hosted in sports halls and the like
Resources
- Hochschule Darmstadt, Faculty of Design – use of infrastructure
- materials

- tools and equipment
- Colache social centre - Municipality
- materials - companies

- tools

- audiovisual equipment – Universidad de Alicante, UPV
- volunteers, associations, entities
- every workshop team looked for their own main sponsors
Long-term effects
During summer 2015, some of the constructed pieces have been used for cultural or leisure events - exhibitions, talks, concerts, a place to relax... 
Going more interdisciplinary in its 2nd edition.
Support by the Municipality
To be evaluated
Personal notes



Participants´
Quotes



Tutors´
Quotes



No comments:

Post a Comment